King’s ‘Dream’ was a radical economic equality message

08/27/2010 4:33 pm 3 comments

By Roland S. Martin

Very few things will make my skin crawl more than listening to someone totally misrepresent the famous “I Have A Dream” speech the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. gave on Aug. 28, 1963.

It’s clear that far too many people haven’t bothered to actually read or listen to the speech. Instead, folks – especially those who likely would have branded King a communist, socialist, Marxist or a racial hell-bent on destroying America – love to tout Dr. King’s “content of character” line in order to push back against a variety of issues, especially affirmative action.

Just today, I saw a press release from Project 21, a coalition of black conservatives, suggesting that a rally planned Saturday by a radio talk show host and Fox News personality is akin to the 1963 march.

Coby Dillard, a member of Project 21, is quoted as saying, “”The dream of Dr. King — that every person be judged by their character rather than their color — is one of the tenets that makes our nation honorable in the minds of people around the world. Dr. King’s legacy is a gift to us all, and no one person or organization holds claim to his work and his message. I can think of no better way to honor him by renewing our shared commitment to uphold those principles that have held our country together throughout history.”

It’s clear that Dillard, and so many others, haven’t read a history book or other publications surrounding the march, and instead, love to continue to spread falsehoods, misrepresentations and outright fabrications stemming from the Washington, D.C. march.

First, we need to stop calling it the March on Washington. It was officially called the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. If you leave off the “Jobs and Freedom” part, it sounds like black folks just went for a walk that day. Upset with the lack of economic opportunities for blacks at the time, as well as the voting rights injustices, the organizers wanted to put pressure on Congress and the President John F. Kennedy administration to put their muscle behind a comprehensive civil rights bill.

No, the 1963 march had nothing to do with some hokey values espoused by a radio/TV windbag. It was a day to assemble a mass of people to represent a show of strength, and to get leaders in Washington, D.C. to listen to the urgent need taking place across the country.

Second, we continue to misrepresent Dr. King’s speech as the “I Have a Dream” speech.

As CNN’s Soledad O’Brien reported in the special, “MLK Papers: Words That Changed a Nation,” the speech was never called that. It was actually titled “Normalcy – Never Again.” In fact, the “I Have A Dream” portion, which represents the bottom third of it, wasn’t in the original text.

As Soledad reported, Dr. King often gave variations of the “Dream” portion of the speech, and on that day, he was encouraged by gospel great Mahalia Jackson to tell the audience about his “dream.”

There is no doubt that his soaring oratory about the need for racial harmony continues to send chills down our spines today, but if we as a country get so excited and wrapped up in the “dream” sequence, we forget the economic nightmare Dr. King painted in the top two-thirds of the speech. When I give speeches, I often tell folks the “I Have A Dream” portion is the “hoop” part, which is when the pastor begins sing, scream and shout when he/she has finished the sermon. But the real measure of a sermon is the scripture, which serves as the thesis of the sermon.

So let’s get to the meat – or the purpose – of Dr. King’s 1963 speech.

At the top he lays out the vision of slaves being freed by the Emancipation Proclamation, yet 100 years later, “One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land.”

Then he makes clear that the purpose of going to the Lincoln Memorial is to “dramatize a shameful condition.”

“In a sense we’ve come to our nation’s capital to cash a check,” Dr. King said. “When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir.

“This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the ‘unalienable Rights’ of ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.’ It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note, insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check; a check, which has come back, marked ‘insufficient funds.’

“But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. And so, we’ve come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice.”

King then began to talk about the “fierce urgency of now,” laying out the treacherous conditions upon which Black people lived in, and having to deal with violence and the trampling upon their rights.

He laid bare the despair of not being able to stay in hotel rooms; having to drink out of segregated water fountains; and the lack of voting rights.

Then King launches into the portion about his “Dream.”

Folks, the fulfillment of Dr. King’s dream wasn’t about getting along. It was about every man and woman being afforded equal rights, and an opportunity to find a job, raise their family and not have to suffer from policy brutality. His speech wasn’t partisan or political; it was prophetic and was about prosperity.

How is it relevant today? If anyone wants to model that march, then stop with the ego driven nonsense and focus on pushing Congress to enact a jobs bill so Americans can work. Tell Democrats and Republicans to stop playing footsy with lobbyists and looking out for Wall Streets interests. Tell leaders in Washington, D.C. to give a damn about the poor of this country, from the hills of West Virginia to the dusty roads in Alabama. Tell some Republicans to stop their shameful condemnations of Americans who can’t find a job.

For the nearly 250,000 who gathered on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on Aug. 28, 1963, it wasn’t about ego, it was about results. There was no partisan agenda; it was one where whites and Blacks refused to stand idly by and watch Black Americans denied an opportunity to thrive in this country. In the final five years of his life, Dr. King fought for equal pay for sanitation workers in Memphis, and was planning a Poor Peoples Campaign for DC, to highlight the economic injustices.

Please, take the time to go and read or listen to the speech. Understand the context. Examine the overall mission. And don’t try to pimp and pervert Dr. King’s prophetic word so you can score some political points.

And that goes for a charlatan, even if they have a TV or radio show, who seeks to align themselves with Dr. King’s momentous and radical speech 47 years ago.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger... Sphere: Related Content

Related Posts
Final Thoughts On Super Bowl-Twitter Controversy
By Roland S. Martin Based on several tweets I made on my Twitter feed on Super Bowl Sunday yesterday, I have ...
READ MORE
Roland Martin’s Statement Regarding The H&M David Beckham Ad
By Roland S. Martin Editor-in-Chief RolandMartinReports.com Fam, let me address the issue that some in the LGBT community have raised regarding some of ...
READ MORE
ROLAND S. MARTIN: Occupy Wall Street Should Be Moral, Not Political, Movement
By Roland S. Martin Editor-in-Chief RolandMartinReports.com Whenever there is an uprising among the people of this country in the form of protest and ...
READ MORE
ROLAND S. MARTIN: GOP Blows off Latinos in CNN/Tea Party Express Debate
While the media's political high priests go gaga over Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann's lying about the effects of the HPV ...
READ MORE
ROLAND S. MARTIN: GOP Race Not Down to Romney and Perry
There are times when even I want to round up as many members of the media as possible, put them ...
READ MORE
MLK Is Worthy of a National Monument
It's only fitting that during the week we were to dedicate the memorial in Washington, D.C., to the Rev. Dr. ...
READ MORE
ROLAND S. MARTIN: Texas A&M would be nuts to leave Big 12 for SEC
When talking to a friend who wanted to cheat on his wife, the Malik Yoba character in the movie “Why ...
READ MORE
Newsweek Cover Of Bachmann Sexist? Get Real
In all of my years covering politics on the local, state and national level, many stories have earned the "Are ...
READ MORE
Divided Government Means Compromise Is a Must
When congressional Republicans, egged on by the boisterous voices of the tea party, vigorously objected to President Barack Obama's signing ...
READ MORE
Time To Shut Down Ideological Purists In Debt Ceiling Fight
Watching Republicans and Democrats squabble over their ideological battle lines with regard to the debt ceiling is the same as ...
READ MORE
Final Thoughts On Super Bowl-Twitter Controversy
Roland Martin’s Statement Regarding The H&M David Beckham
ROLAND S. MARTIN: Occupy Wall Street Should Be
ROLAND S. MARTIN: GOP Blows off Latinos in
ROLAND S. MARTIN: GOP Race Not Down to
MLK Is Worthy of a National Monument
ROLAND S. MARTIN: Texas A&M would be nuts
Newsweek Cover Of Bachmann Sexist? Get Real
Divided Government Means Compromise Is a Must
Time To Shut Down Ideological Purists In Debt
  • James

    I noticed you didn't have a problem with any democrat in your article. Beck didn't go to REPRESENT MLK. You and your friends imply he did. We didn't go to DC for Beck. We went for VALUES………..abortion, low taxes and love of our feloow man.any color. Fact is……we could have gone for peanuts and it wouldn't be any of your business on that day…WE all own DC,,,,,,,,,,not just YOU.

  • Michael

    James,

    Glenn Beck did indeed suggest, imply, and outright claim that he would “represent MLK”. To be specific, said that this rally was to reclaim not only Dr. King's dream, but also the Civil Rights Movement and did so numerous times on both his radio and television show. For him to suggest that wasn't a part of the lead up towards this rally is at best denial and at worst a complete lie, a fabrication of the truth. It was only in the last few weeks that Mr. Beck started focusing on values. On May 26, Beck stated that his rally would reclaim the Civil Rights ( Movement http://www.rolandsmartin.com/blog/index.php/2010/08/30/roland-tjms-08-30-10-roland-s-martintom-joyner-morning-show-roland-martin-discusses-glenn-beck-and-the-restoring-honor-rally/ ). On May, 24 Beck aired audio of Rev. Al Sharpton's statement that King's “dream” was “not to put one black family in the White House. The dream was to make everything equal in everybody's house.” Beck responded: “That is not the dream. That is a perversion of the dream. We are the people of the civil rights movement. We are the ones that must stand for civil and equal rights. Equal rights. Justice. Equal justice. Not special justice, not social justice, but equal justice.” He added, “We are the inheritors and the protectors of the civil rights movement. They are perverting it.” (http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201005240029) On a June 14th edition of his television show, Beck claimed that “Martin Luther King's dream is being massively perverted”… “It's time to set it right. One side has all the power. Enough power.” (http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201006140037). The point is what has got so many people so upset Beck suggesting that he is carrying the legacy of the Civil Right Movement and Dr. King dream. That's what's insulting to so many. No, what Beck is doing is taking a narrow, truncated version of Dr. King and the movement it the whole truth with it is not. Beck opposes the meat and substance of what note what the “I Have a Dream Speech” was about, but what Dr. King advocated, yet he is the carrier of Dr. King and The Movement… Balderdash!!! Roland was absolutely right, you're the one off base and nobody should stand by and allow Mr. Beck or anyone to distort what King, the message, and the movement was for his own personal gain!!!

  • Az Debtman

    Forget Beck! Beck is false prophet “standing sinner” who drank the TEA, came out the barn and swore Toto and Dorothy were in there. Swear to … Blame Bush. Blame Cheney. Because when the 108th Congress came in to power they brought, by “striking Attorney General,” while in the consultation with the United States Constitution, while in the consultation of the people of the United States unattested unto the Secretary, the Secretary of Homeland Security. No America for you. Just YOU LIE! YOU LIE! Stop! No “Z” Patch! Attest! Attest! Unto… Beck is just finishing the TEAM GOP endgame that was left on the table prior to the failed coup de America 2000-2008. Beck is jut spitting out flammatory rehetoric to keep the GOP endgame alive. If the GOP gets back he House or the Senate. It's Papers Please! No Papers no REAL ID for you! Beck is the diversion to the reality of evil doers behind his soul!

More from the Roland S. Martin Blog